2. ¾nandasutta½
32. Atha kho ±yasm± ±nando yena bhagav± tenupasaªkami; upasaªkamitv± bhagavanta½ abhiv±detv± ekamanta½ nis²di. Ekamanta½ nisinno kho ±yasm± ±nando bhagavanta½ etadavoca– “Siy± nu kho, bhante, bhikkhuno tath±r³po sam±dhipaµil±bho yath± imasmiñca saviññ±ºake k±ye ahaªk±ramamaªk±ram±n±nusay± n±ssu, bahiddh± ca sabbanimittesu ahaªk±ramamaªk±ram±n±nusay± n±ssu; yañca cetovimutti½ paññ±vimutti½ upasampajja viharato ahaªk±ramamaªk±ram±n±nusay± na honti tañca cetovimutti½ paññ±vimutti½ upasampajja vihareyy±”ti? “Siy±, ±nanda, bhikkhuno tath±r³po sam±dhipaµil±bho yath± imasmiñca saviññ±ºake k±ye ahaªk±ramamaªk±ram±n±nusay± n±ssu, bahiddh± ca sabbanimittesu ahaªk±ramamaªk±ram±n±nusay± n±ssu; yañca cetovimutti½ paññ±vimutti½ upasampajja viharato ahaªk±ramamaªk±ram±n±nusay± na honti tañca cetovimutti½ paññ±vimutti½ upasampajja vihareyy±”ti. “Yath± katha½ pana, bhante, siy± bhikkhuno tath±r³po sam±dhipaµil±bho yath± imasmiñca saviññ±ºake k±ye ahaªk±ramamaªk±ram±n±nusay± n±ssu, bahiddh± ca sabbanimittesu ahaªk±ramamaªk±ram±n±nusay± n±ssu; yañca cetovimutti½ paññ±vimutti½ upasampajja viharato ahaªk±ramamaªk±ram±n±nusay± na honti tañca cetovimutti½ paññ±vimutti½ upasampajja vihareyy±”ti? “Idh±nanda bhikkhuno eva½ hoti– ‘eta½ santa½ eta½ paº²ta½ yadida½ sabbasaªkh±rasamatho sabb³padhipaµinissaggo taºh±kkhayo vir±go nirodho nibb±nan’ti. Eva½ kho, ±nanda, siy± bhikkhuno tath±r³po sam±dhipaµil±bho yath± imasmiñca saviññ±ºake k±ye ahaªk±ramamaªk±ram±n±nusay± n±ssu, bahiddh± ca sabbanimittesu ahaªk±ramamaªk±ram±n±nusay± n±ssu; yañca cetovimutti½ paññ±vimutti½ upasampajja viharato ahaªk±ramamaªk±ram±n±nusay± na honti tañca cetovimutti½ paññ±vimutti½ upasampajja vihareyy±”ti. “Idañca pana meta½, ±nanda, sandh±ya bh±sita½ p±r±yane puººakapañhe–
“Saªkh±ya lokasmi½ paropar±ni [parovar±ni (s². p².) su. ni. 1054; c³¼ani. puººakam±ºavapucch± 73],
yassiñjita½ natthi kuhiñci loke;
santo vidh³mo an²gho [anigho (s². sy±. ka½. p².), anagho (?)] Nir±so,
at±ri so j±tijaranti br³m²”ti. Dutiya½.